name='verify-v1'/>"> MediaTrial

Friday, June 22, 2012

U.S. 'Mulls' New Covert Raids in Pakistan

Sphere: Related Content

(WASHINGTON) — U.S. military and intelligence officials are so frustrated with Pakistan's failure to stop local militant groups from attacking Americans in neighboring Afghanistan that they have considered launching secret joint U.S.-Afghan commando raids into Pakistan to hunt them down, officials told The Associated Press.

But the idea, which U.S. officials say comes up every couple of months, has been consistently rejected because the White House believes the chance of successfully rooting out the deadly Haqqani network would not be worth the intense diplomatic blowback from Pakistan that inevitably would ensue.

(MORE: Revisiting a Key Legal Basis for Obama's Anti-Terrorism Drone Strikes)

Members of the Haqqani tribe have been targeted by pilotless U.S. drone aircraft, but sending American and Afghan troops into Pakistan would be a serious escalation of the hunt for terrorists and potentially the final straw for Pakistan, already angered over what it sees as U.S. violations of its sovereignty.

The al-Qaida-allied Haqqani tribe runs a mafia-like smuggling operation and occasionally turns to terrorism with the aim of controlling its territory in eastern Afghanistan. The Haqqanis use Pakistani towns to plan, train and arm themselves with guns and explosives, cross into Afghanistan to attack NATO and Afghan forces, then retreat back across the border to safety.

The latest round of debate over whether to launch clandestine special operations raids into Pakistan against the Haqqanis came after the June 1 car bombing of Forward Operating Base Salerno in eastern Afghanistan that injured up to 100 U.S. and Afghan soldiers, according to three current and two former U.S. officials who were briefed on the discussions. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the still-evolving debates.

The officials told the AP that recent discussions of clandestine ground attacks have included Gen. John Allen, the senior U.S. commander in Afghanistan, as well as top CIA and special operations officials.

Allen's spokesman, Navy Cmdr. Brook DeWalt, said Allen "has not and does not intend to push for a cross-border operation."

The White House and the CIA declined to comment for this story.

Pentagon spokesman George Little said the U.S. was still focused on U.S.-Pakistan cooperation.

"The key is to work together with Pakistan to find ways of fighting terrorists who threaten both the United States and Pakistan, including along the Afghan-Pakistan border, where extremists continue to plot attacks against coalition forces and innocent civilians," he said.

The U.S. relationship with Pakistan is arguably at its lowest point over the continuation of drone strikes to hit terror targets in Pakistan, the successful Navy SEAL raid in Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden that was carried out without a heads-up to the country's leaders and the U.S. refusal to apologize for a border skirmish in which the U.S. mistakenly killed 24 Pakistani troops. On Thursday, the State Department's inspector general accused the Pakistani government of harassing U.S. Embassy personnel.

Pakistan has done little in response to repeated U.S. requests for a crackdown on the Haqqanis, and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta surprisingly voiced that frustration in a visit to Kabul this month.

He said the U.S. was "reaching the limits" of its patience with Pakistan's failure to tackle the tribe's safe havens. He added that the U.S. was "extraordinarily dissatisfied with the effect that Pakistan has had on the Haqqanis." He also made fun of Pakistan's ignorance over the bin Laden raid at a speech in India, Pakistan's archrival.

Pakistan's army has attacked militant strongholds across the tribal areas, except for North Waziristan, where the Haqqanis hold sway and shelter both al-Qaida and Taliban militants. Pakistani officials say that they intend to hit North Waziristan but that their army is too overstretched to move as fast as the U.S. demands.

Pakistani officials have conceded privately, however, that they have been reluctant to take on the powerful tribe for fear of retaliatory strikes.

To make up for Pakistan's inaction, the CIA's covert drone program has targeted Haqqani leaders, safe houses, bomb factories and training camps inside Pakistan, and special operations raids have hit Haqqani targets on the Afghan side of the border, but that has failed to stop Haqqani attacks on U.S. and Afghan troops and civilian targets.

The officials say Allen expressed frustration that militants would attack and then flee across the border in Pakistan, immediately taking shelter in urban areas where attacking them by missile fire could kill civilians.

The officials say options that have been prepared for President Barack Obama's review included raids that could be carried out by U.S. special operations forces together with Afghan commandos, ranging from air assaults that drop raiders deep inside the tribal areas to hit top leaders to shorter dashes only a few miles into Pakistan territory.

The shorter raids would not necessarily be covert, as they could be carried out following the U.S. military principle known as "hot pursuit" that military officials say entitles their forces to pursue a target that attacks them in Afghanistan up to 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) inside a neighboring country's territory.

The U.S. has staged two major raids and other minor forays into Pakistan's tribal territory before during the George W. Bush administration; the most contentious was in September 2008 when Navy SEALs raided an al-Qaida compound. The operators killed their target, but the ensuing firefight triggered a diplomatic storm with Pakistan.

Rather than fly in, which U.S. military planners at the time feared would alert the Pakistanis, the SEALs marched across the mountainous border, arriving later than planned because of the harsh terrain and just as the fighters were waking for morning prayers, according to one current and one former U.S. official. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the clandestine operation.

Everyone inside the targeted compound opened fire on the SEALs, including the women, one of whom lightly wounded one of the American operators. The firefight also woke the entire village, which joined in the battle, so the SEALs had to call for strafing runs by Black Hawk helicopters to beat them back.

At least one woman and one child were among the many dead.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2117888,00.html#ixzz1yWekpJ8s

RAJA PERVEZ ASHRAF A TAINTED PM.

Sphere: Related Content

Born on December 26, 1950 in Sanghar, Sindh, Raja Pervez Ashraf has been elected MNA as a PPPP candidate. After completing a B.A degree from University of Sindh in 1970, his professional occupation has been that of business and agriculture.

It is ironically wonderful that Raja being former minister to water and power development authority (Wapda) had been fully failed to eliminate energy crisis (load shedding) from Pakistan and also has been involved in corruption allegation for receiving kickbacks in rental power projects and buying properties in London. The Supreme Court of Pakistan is hearing rental power projects case "Rental power projects case" and buying property overseas with corrupt payments "buying property overseas with corrupt payments". He was forced to resign due to corrupt practises.On 22 JUNE 2012 he was nominated as the prime minister of PAKISTAN after Syed Yousuf Raza GIllani.

The designated prime minister of Pakistan Raja is well know for his corruption, industrious, unlawful and much more being going to steering Pakistan.

Many think that this is foul play with opposition parties especially to PML-N. Zaradari wants to trap PML-N by winning its candidate for PM slot so that anomaly for the  remaining period in terms of premier ship may be account far into PML-N.

What do you say?

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Pakistan PM will not appeal contempt conviction: lawyer

Sphere: Related Content

First of all, the objection over the punishment till the rising of court! The question arise as to why the micro punishment was given to PM, if so, why the precious time and money of the nation put to bin by the SC bench. It is, however, itself contempt of court by the Court, the dignity and decorum has been damaged by the judges of SC and invited to everyone come and the ridiculing the independence of the judiciary or defaming freely.


Secondly, the Speaker of National Assembly has failed to apply her mind as required by the Constitution and prevailing laws, and take the side to her party because of favouring to her husband Mirza Sahib back to wicket and hit sixes and fours around the ground.

Thirdly, all legal experts sided to PPP-p including SYRG, the Prime Minister of Pakistan insisting not to contempt the Court, but altogether, ignoring the definition to S.63 ibid read with Section 5 of Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 (Ordinance V of 2003). Once punished means disqualification. Very right if not going to appeal is just as deemed to disqualified by himself not by the SC.

This is what, not obeying, in-comprising, industrious attitude that leads Mr. Bhutto to death sentence; and remaining are just going on the same path and following to their founder!

Friday, May 25, 2012

FOUNTAING HOUSE. LAHORE: EMBAZZLEMENT OF MONEY OF PATIENT MR. MOHI UD DIN AKRAM BY DR. SYED IMRAN MURTAZA M.S

Sphere: Related Content



Memo No:cms93345/Reminder-01                        Through Courier

Monday, April 09, 2012

Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza
MBBS (DOW), MPH
Medical Superintendent
Fountain House: -
Address: 37-Lower Mall, Near Session Court, Lahore (54000)- Pakistan
Tel: +92-42-37352803-05, 37320402, 37114778
Email: ms@fountainhouse.com.pk, imranpkk@hotmail.com
Email: fountainhouse_dmhr@yahoo.com,
pprc@wol.net.pk
URL: http://www.fountainhouse.com.pk

Subject:        LEGAL NOTICE

Reference:    IN THE MATTER OF MR. MOHI-UD-DIN AKRAM (RESIDENT PATIENT) AT FOUNTAIN HOUSE, LAHORE.

This has been reference to the subject cited above wherein you were called upon to explain the following within period of seven days, but, unfortunately, you have failed to do so.

However, you are once again provided with an opportunity to explain your position within further time of seven days of receipt of this communication.

Consequent upon failure to comply with your commitments in respect of returning money illegally kept by you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza, Medical Superintendent, Fountain House, Lahore, to the tune of Rs.160,000/- of my real elder brother Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram who is not only an innocent citizen and also a resident patient at Fountain House, Lahore for the last several years and till to date no report writing regarding his health and care has been issued to his family. In view of the facts, a LEGAL NOTICE is being served on you to explain the following:

AND WHEREAS, you au courant with the complaint lodged with the office of the Punjab Chief Minister by the undersigned against a fraudulent namely Muhammad Naeem who has been working in the same office while ago, a Punjab Government employee who had fraudulently defrauded his money for illegally preparation of documents for U.S.A. Visa and also for appointing Mr. MOHI-UD-DIN AKRAM in some government department for which he defrauded Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram and deprived my brother from his hard money to the tune of  Rs.180,000/-.

AND WHEREAS, the complaint was acknowledged and respectively attended by the office of the Punjab Chief Minister (Complaint Cell) Deputy Secretary Mr. Irfan Nazir who recovered the money Rs.180,000/- from the above said fraudulent.

AND WHEREAS, the Deputy Secretary, Mr. Irfan Nazir had brought this money along with the accused Muhammad Naeem to your office and delivered the sum of Rs.180,000/- to Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram on 17th June,2011.

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza received and kept Rs. 160,000/- out of the recovered money Rs.180,000/-with your self or elsewhere without lawful authority and without intimation and presence of complainant (the undersigned).

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza, au courant with the matter and , without consulting and consent of the the undersigned, reimbursed Rs.20,000/- to the above said fraudulent and got signed different papers from Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram and kept with yourself all those papers without lawful authority and till date the signed documents have neither shown nor supplied copies or originals to the undersigned despite of demand on several times.

AND WHEREAS, upon visits and phone calls by the undersigned to you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza have either been escaped from your office or cunningly sharped different excuses on different occasions which strengthened the doubt that there is gross violation, cheating and fraud in the matter and possibly you defrauded and swallowed the recovered money aforesaid for your unknown personal vested interests.

AND WHEREAS, almost 9-Months and 6-Days, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza giving no hand and not cooperating to return the money illegally kept by you and deliberately failed to deliver the aforesaid recovered money to Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram in spite of my letter dated 28 February 2012 in which I demanded to return the same to my real elder brother.

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza is also hereby called upon to explain the reasons as to why you kept the recovered money i.e. Rs.160,000/- without any lawful authority.

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza is hereby called upon to explain the reasons as to under which capacity and to why you written off Rs.20,000/- to the fraudulent Muhammad Naeem without the consent of the undersigned (”the Complainant”).

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza is also hereby called upon to explain the reasons as to under which capacity and to why you got signatures on the papers from Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram while upon my demand the signed papers have ever supplied to me or Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram nor provided any certified true  copies of the same.

AND WHEREAS, it has been observed with great concern that instead of giving some vocational training or skilled education that can bring him to the normal life, Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram has been made peon by you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza with your office and put responsibilities on him for which he can not take that causes not only serious hazards to his mental health but also physical unfit that tantamount more problems faced by him as he has always been complained regarding undue responsibilities which is entirely contrary to health case measures and also contrary to the vision and mission statements of Fountain House, Lahore.

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza is further called upon the explain the reasons as to why and under which capacity, you are used to interfere within the family matters of others, and in the meanwhile, you were advised to refrain yourself from poking your nose into someone’s family matters and keep yourself away and be within the limits of patient’s healthcare which is your absolute duty for which your are being paid by the Fountain House, Lahore and the donors.

AND WHEREAS, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza deliberately connivance for attending and redressing the issue causing the undersigned and to the patient Mr. Mohi-ud-Din serious mental torture that leads towards proceeding to be initiated against you in terms of cognizable offense.

AND WHEREAS, keeping in view of above, you Dr. Syed Imran Murtaza is hereby advised to explain the reasons in writing with documentary evidence within the stipulated period of seven (7) days of receipt of this communication, failing which the undersigned reserves the right to take appropriate legal action(s) as warranted under the law.

Be informed, the undersigned has also reserves the right to bring under the knowledge of all stake holders, donors and collaborators and also to take the matter in the media (both national and international) for which all expenses/ costs, and funds, whatsoever, shall be borne by you.



(JUNAID AKRAM)
junaid@mediatrial.com
13/10-Fane Road, Lahore.
Brother of;
Mr. Mohi-ud-Din Akram (Patient) at Fountain House, Lahore.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Pakistani who helped US sentenced to prison

Sphere: Related Content

A Pakistani doctor who helped the U.S. track down Osama bin Laden was convicted of high treason Wednesday and sentenced to 33 years in prison, officials said, a verdict that is likely to further strain the country's relationship with Washington.

Shakil Afridi ran a vaccination program for the CIA to collect DNA and verify bin Laden's presence at the compound in the town of Abbottabad where U.S. commandos killed the al-Qaida chief last May. The operation outraged Pakistani officials because they were not told about it beforehand.http://news.yahoo.com/video/miamicbs4-15750840/pakistan-not-revealing-if-bin-laden-had-inside-sources-in-pakistani-government-29148590.html

Senior U.S. officials have called for Afridi to be released, saying his work served Pakistani and American interests. His conviction comes at a sensitive time because the U.S. is already frustrated by Pakistan's refusal to reopen NATO supply routes to Afghanistan. The supply routes were closed six months ago in retaliation for American airstrikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.

Afridi also was ordered to pay a fine of about $3,500 and will spend an additional three and half years in prison if he does not, said Nasir Khan, a government official in the Khyber tribal area, where the doctor was arrested and tried.

Afridi was tried under the Frontier Crimes Regulations, or FCR, the set of laws that govern Pakistan's semiautonomous tribal region. Human rights organizations have criticized the FCR for not providing suspects due process of law. There is no right to legal representation, to present material evidence or cross-examine witnesses. Verdicts are normally handed down by a Khyber government official in consultation with a council of government elders.

 
Custom Search